The first major difference to point out here is that Backblaze offers unlimited cloud storage on a per device basis (priced at $7 per month, per device) whereas SpiderOak One Backup, on the other hand, provides set allocations of cloud storage for an entire account (from 150GB at $6 per month upwards) with this allocation been shareable between an unlimited number of personal devices. In this section I will be comparing Backblaze with SpiderOak One on some of the core features of each service, this includes the amount of cloud storage on offer, the pricing of the service, the operating systems supported plus several other metrics including historic file versioning and multi-factor authentication support. In this comparison I hope to highlight the differences between them and point out which solution might be better in several different situations, time to go and compare to two!

This makes for a comparison between two products which have, by default, strong AES 256-bit data encryption applied to all data at all times, easy to use desktop software, unlimited historic file versioning options and are both available on straightforward monthly plans starting form just $7 and $6 per month respectively.Īt first glance these two backup solutions share a lot of similar features and philosophies when it comes to delivering a secure cloud backup solution. What makes this such a good comparison between Backblaze and SpiderOak One Backup is that both of these services not only have a strong cloud offering at their core, but both also put user privacy and data security at the forefront of their offerings. In this post I will be comparing Backblaze and SpiderOak One Backup, two very strong backup solutions which both feature secure cloud storage, unlimited historic file versioning and always-on data encryption as a key part of their offerings!

Backblaze mac backup